BUSINESS RESEARCH

Inclusive and Sustainable Service Design

A service is more than its front-end journey: it is a system of research, governance, delivery channels, data, and resources. Barriers to inclusion and sustainability usually form inside that system long before launch, not just at the point of delivery. This Hot Topic explains where those barriers commonly arise and why service designers should consider them from the outset, rather than retrofitting a solution once it already exists.

Share
Inclusive and Sustainable Service Design

A useful way to see a service is as a system of interconnected parts: the research that builds understanding, the governance that sets scope and resource, the channels that deliver the service, the data and back-office rules that process it, and the supply chain that resources it. Villari (2022) argues that sustainable outcomes depend on treating a service this way, working across individual, organisational and policy levels rather than fixing isolated touchpoints. Barriers to inclusion or sustainability can take root at any one of these levels, and a barrier introduced early tends to shape everything built on top of it.

Barriers often begin in research and insight. If recruitment for user research favours people who are easiest to reach, whole groups are represented by proxy or left out entirely, and the personas and needs statements built from that research carry the gap forward. CABE’s (2006) principles of inclusive design call for genuinely acknowledging the diversity of who will use a service, while Kim (2018) frames this as recognising exclusion: people can be excluded permanently, temporarily or only in certain situations, and a design built around one narrow picture of the user will miss all three.

Barriers also form in governance and the design brief itself. If inclusion and sustainability are not named as outcomes with measures attached when scope and budget are agreed, they have no formal claim on resource once delivery pressure builds, and they are pushed into a ‘nice-to-have’ backlog. Who has the authority to challenge a brief on these grounds, and at what point, often decides whether they are addressed at all. This is why the occupational standard for the role expects service designers to question and challenge the design brief itself, and to work ethically and sustainably throughout research and design activity, rather than treating these as later add-ons (Skills England, 2023).

Delivery channels and back-office processes create further barriers. A single digital channel excludes people without reliable access, confidence or the right device; eligibility rules and legacy IT systems encode assumptions about a ‘typical’ user that do not hold for everyone. On the sustainability side, the same early architecture and procurement decisions fix resource use for years: printing defaults, travel patterns, data storage and single-use materials are far easier to specify once than to remove later.

These two kinds of barriers frequently reinforce each other rather than sitting in separate parts of the system. A channel strategy built to cut resource use, such as closing local offices in favour of a single digital route, can exclude users who need in-person or paper support; adding accessible formats or extra channels without reviewing their footprint can, in turn, raise materials, energy or travel. Treating inclusion and sustainability as one system-level question, rather than two separate checks, avoids solving one barrier by quietly creating another.

This is precisely why timing matters so much. Tan, Otto and Wood (2017) found that decisions made before a design is frozen account for the large majority of a system’s downstream cost and performance, and that problems traced back to that early stage take roughly 13 times more rework to fix once discovered later. Meadows (1999) makes a related point about systems generally: structure, not individual fixes, determines behaviour, so changing rules, information flows or goals early reshapes the whole system, while adjustments made after the structure is set only manage the symptoms it produces.

For service designers, this means inclusion and sustainability work best as design constraints from the first questioning of the brief, not as checks applied once a solution is built. Addressing them from the outset costs less, reaches further into the system, and reflects the ethical and sustainable practice expected of the role, rather than treating equity and environmental impact as problems to solve once the design is already fixed.

Referenced techniques

Technique

Embedding Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion

Embracing Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) is crucial for leaders who want to create innovative, inclusive workplaces. The Equality Act 2010 protects key characteristics, but EDI goes beyond compliance. Leaders who champion these values foster a culture of diverse perspectives, improving collaboration, trust, and team dynamics.

Technique

Values-based Leadership

Values-based leadership begins with clarity about personal and organisational values. Aligning behaviour with these values fosters trust, ethical decision-making, and positive cultures. This technique defines values-driven leadership and how it inspires authenticity, purpose, and sustained integrity.

Technique

Diversity Management

Effective workplace diversity management policies have been demonstrated to aid creative thinking processes and innovation. Case study evidence from a variety of sectors and implementation advice is provided to help managers increase the success of diversity management initiatives.

Technique

Corporate Sustainability

Corporate Sustainability (CS) integrates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into business strategies to enhance resilience, ethical alignment, and long-term growth. It drives innovation, attracts talent, meets stakeholder expectations, and creates lasting value for society.

The Leading Edge logo

Join thousands of professionals exploring the latest thinking, emerging trends and practical ideas across leadership, people, digital, strategy and organisational performance.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.
The latest thinking from across business, in brief.
Leading Edge magazine image

Trusted by Over 700 Organisations
and More than 2,000 Learners

“The quality of support I have received from my coach has been extremely high. His coaching is considered, tailored and aligned to my personal experience, career stage as well as my day-to-day balancing of responsibilities. My apprenticeship has helped to bolster my confidence that I am taking a reasonable approach with some challenging clients.”

“The apprenticeship with KnowledgeBrief was transformative, improving my leadership, strategic decisions, and confidence. I gained skills in planning, change management, financial acumen, and stakeholder engagement. Completing with distinction, I secured a new contract and expanded my consultancy.”

“The coaching course through KnowledgeBrief was well-structured, balancing theoretical and practical knowledge. The platform is easy to navigate, providing access to support and promoting a solid understanding of coaching fundamentals. The resources provided have been comprehensive.”

“KnowledgeBrief has great content and is detailed in the area I am developing in. The system is very clear and easy to use and navigate. Thanks to my Skills Coach for his support and guidance. I apply my course knowledge and experience, such as team performance, leadership styles, and the Eisenhower Matrix, to manage tasks effectively.”

“The apprenticeship has greatly enhanced my understanding of strategic work and how different areas of the organisation operate. It has boosted my confidence to ask questions and take on senior-level tasks. Studying has pushed me out of my comfort zone, showing me my capabilities and improving my overall performance.”

“The support has been timely and professional and, since starting, I have increased my knowledge through the online platform and workshops. I'm covering subjects like business understanding, communication, and operational plans - which has boosted my confidence. I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it.”

“As a result of this apprenticeship, I have gained confidence at work. I've developed key skills in project management, communication, and technical processes, and have improved my performance through focused feedback. I am now better prepared to contribute to the team's goals and tackle future challenges.”

“I have seen positive work improvements using what I’ve learnt about leadership, communication, and decision-making. I highly recommend the easy-to-use KnowledgeBrief platform with visual progress tracking, extra resources, and valuable information.”

“This journey has strengthened my strategic vision, stakeholder management, team and organisational influencing skills, and, most importantly, my confidence in communication. The structured learning and the tailored guidance has proven invaluable in giving me direction and purpose as a senior leader.”

“This course improved my performance by helping me create strategies, demonstrate values, develop my team, identify growth areas, and gain leadership principles like communication, conflict resolution, and strategic thinking. I highly recommend it to anyone looking to strengthen their leadership abilities and make an impact.”

Equip your employees with the skills to increase results

If you would like to discuss how we can create your Professional Training Programmes, please get in touch

Start conversation